wait did they really retcon <b> as the "bring attention to" element lol https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/b
wait did they really retcon <b> as the "bring attention to" element lol https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/b 18 comments
@aparrish "Do not confuse the <b> element with the <strong>, <em>, or <mark> elements. The <strong> element represents text of certain importance..." wow, they really are committed to this particular bit @aparrish holy crap! I'm dying laughing over here. Who decided this was the way to go, I want a name "< u >: The Unarticulated Annotation" Fantastic. I was wondering how they were going to get out of that one, but they came through. @jalefkowit i'm just as susceptible to puritan technical distinctions as the next programmer. but at some point you have to recognize that when you're defining a "semantic" tag in terms of the kind of type that is typically used to express those semantics... you have to admit to yourself that content and presentation are forever inextricably entangled @aparrish It's not even a technical distinction, though. It's just pure woo conjured out of thin air to avoid having to say "we realized later that these things shouldn't be tags at all, but not until after we reimplemented them a few times like idiots" @aparrish I don't hate this because it's emphasizing the semantic purpose separate from the formatting, which makes sense. |
@aparrish oh my god WHAT