@jalefkowit i'm just as susceptible to puritan technical distinctions as the next programmer. but at some point you have to recognize that when you're defining a "semantic" tag in terms of the kind of type that is typically used to express those semantics... you have to admit to yourself that content and presentation are forever inextricably entangled
@aparrish It's not even a technical distinction, though. It's just pure woo conjured out of thin air to avoid having to say "we realized later that these things shouldn't be tags at all, but not until after we reimplemented them a few times like idiots"