|
Top-level
 This brings us to Google. Why in the world has Google been more than complicit in nerfing the web's chances on mobile? To answer this you need to grok that Google, like Apple and every other big company, is an agglomeration of small companies that happen to send their revenues to the same place, but probably don't have any love for each other. And Android comes from an acquisition: Danger. /cc @chriscoyier @tomayac 3 comments
If you were in the US in late '09 and consumed any mass media at all, you might still have dreams where Verizon flogs the Motorola Droid at you with teenage boy imagery. Real Lynx body spray territory. That happened on the back of this same of desperation. Giving up the fundamental software stack, and doing heavy co-marketing for a single vendor's hardware launch, was not where telcos wanted to be (spoiler: still isn't, which is why we can't have nice things). /cc @chriscoyier @tomayac For its part, the Android team played this freakout like a fiddle. In a truly ungoogly way, they demanded separate infrastructure, separate cafes, etc. etc. And they got it. There are lots of reasons to loathe Andy Rubin, but what he (and the Plus crew around the same time) helped do to the culture can't be overstated. He wanted a little kingdom to run like a petty tyrant, and he got it. Android was Not Google. /cc @chriscoyier @tomayac |
Gregory's Server
Think back with me to 2008 when Apple had launched the iPhone and Google had the struggling Android system.
This was a multiple-miracle moment: because AT&T had an exclusive w/ Apple for US iPhone distribution, every telco and handset vendor was FREAKING OUT.
/cc @chriscoyier @tomayac