@djsundog @CaribenxMarciaX @ajroach42 I also know of a couple of good ones but Marcia said no generated ones. :x
Top-level
@djsundog @CaribenxMarciaX @ajroach42 I also know of a couple of good ones but Marcia said no generated ones. :x 8 comments
@CaribenxMarciaX @eloisa @ajroach42 I think that's what Andrew found as well, but this one gets you to 80-90% good quickly and allows you to fine-tune the output captions manually to get it to the quality/accuracy you desire. @djsundog @CaribenxMarciaX @eloisa @ajroach42 Yeah, I've been doing a ton of automatic transcriptions using Whisper (the tool Sundog is talking about) for a variety of videos in the Internet Archive as part of a test run of them. They're not perfect (especially with some names), but they are an excellent starting point, and very fast (and effectively free) to generate. If you want to give it a try, you can throw me a video file link and I'll happily send you some subtitle files. @djsundog @CaribenxMarciaX @eloisa We're using Whisper as a base for generating subtitles, and then cleaning them up by hand in subtitle composer. @Ethancdavenport is doing the majority of the manual work in cleanup. Whisper's auto gen is pretty good, it's not perfect, but it takes generating subtitles from a multi-day thing down to a few hours for us. I'll also boost it up in case anyone has better ideas. @CaribenxMarciaX @djsundog @ajroach42 ok, in that case, I personally found both capcut and autocap good enough, so I then just clean up a bit afterwards, dunno if it's the same tools that aj knows of, but using these may help, maybe? I'm assuming you used the ones from youtube, and those suck a lot, indeed. |
@eloisa @djsundog @ajroach42 i say tht bc someone said that generated ones were no good when the film first premiered
so i thought it best not to use them...