#Signal needs to decide if it wants to be an IM or a social network.
https://signal.org/blog/introducing-stories/
If you are trying to "give the people what they want", maybe roll out new features like that as opt-in, not opt-out? If people *really* want it, they will enable it, right?
What happened to getting consent?
But I think we all know people who *already are on Signal* might not actually want "Stories". This is aimed at getting new people; on farming that sweet sweet MAU.
I find that very meh.
Apart from the consent issue (which I think is major), there is also added risk.
More code means more bugs means more attack surface. #Signal is used by, and in fact it is *marketed at*, people at-risk: journalists, activists, and so on.
Adding such a weirdly unrelated feature adds a bunch of potentially vulnerable code, and also adds a lot of complexity for the user. And, for #InfoSec people who might be responsible for helping that user stay safe using Signal.