@Gusted @dachary @humanetech well that did not put me at ease at all. Either the guy is disingenuous or he's misled, none of which are comforting. The A in DAO requires some mechanism to keep the system going and that mechanism is cryptocurrency. There is no other way to programmatically manage the incentives. That's something I certainly don't want any part of.
And I started moving away from Github because I'm very much against what they are doing. I went to Codeberg, so we'll see what they end up doing.
@loke @Gusted @dachary @humanetech yeah, this looks worse than before:
kdumont: I think specifically more information for what “DAO” might include is needed (because it is being confused with crypto) and broader communication that license will remain MIT.
lunny: The emphasis is we want to share the benefits with contributors, DAO is an option tool we found, it’s not a needed if there is better way