@loke @Gusted @dachary @humanetech yeah, this looks worse than before:
kdumont: I think specifically more information for what “DAO” might include is needed (because it is being confused with crypto) and broader communication that license will remain MIT.
lunny: The emphasis is we want to share the benefits with contributors, DAO is an option tool we found, it’s not a needed if there is better way
@loke @Gusted @dachary @humanetech that doesn't look like he's saying that whatever they meant by 'DAO' isn't crypto, but just that they're open to alternatives as well