Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
5 comments
Josh Adams
Bits of this look dope at first glance
Alex Gleason
I'm trying to figure out how/why this is different than ActivityPub.
Matt Hamilton [Maryland]

@alex @josh @curtis

The biggest difference I see is Identity management: atproto.com/guides/identity

That said...

> Usernames are DNS names. They are resolved using the resolveName() XRPC method and should be confirmed by a matching entry in the DID document.
> DIDs are an emerging W3C standard for providing stable & secure IDs. They are used as stable, canonical IDs of users.

W3C, you say? An "emerging standard" (quickly to be abandoned once deficiencies are identified), you say?

@alex @josh @curtis

The biggest difference I see is Identity management: atproto.com/guides/identity

That said...

> Usernames are DNS names. They are resolved using the resolveName() XRPC method and should be confirmed by a matching entry in the DID document.
> DIDs are an emerging W3C standard for providing stable & secure IDs. They are used as stable, canonical IDs of users.

Matt Hamilton [Maryland]

@alex @josh @curtis

I also find it amusing how Jack and the BlueSky people continue to go out of their way to ignore the fact that AP exists. It has problems that need to be fixed, but just straight ignoring it is pretty funny.

from blueskyweb.xyz:

> The web. Email. RSS feeds. XMPP chats. What all these technologies had in common is they allowed people to freely interact and create content, without a single intermediary.

Missing anything, anyone? Bueller?

Alex Gleason
They actually do mention it frequently on their blog (https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/3-6-2022-a-self-authenticating-social-protocol ) and they invited Eugen to a discussion about it (there's some PDF floating around).

Inventing a new protocol instead of fixing the current one is very pretentious though. I wonder if they don't want the existing userbase on purpose.
Go Up