Gregory's Server12. The Fediverse needs investment. Not everyone agrees with this notion because some prefer that it be a hobbyist enclave. For its own long term survival, it needs infrastructure that scales. Not even Mastodon can handle growth.
|
32 comments
 14. With Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter, government and media SHOULD adopt the Fediverse. But WILL they? Not until there's a crisis that forces their hand. Which there will be -- it's just a matter of when. 15. Yesterday, Elon Musk sent out a pro-Russian tweet. Do you think the Ukraine government wants to be on Twitter right now? What about the EU? What about NATO? I guarantee they're looking at the Fediverse as an alternative. 16. Right now is the calm before the storm. People won't leave Twitter until they have to. Eventually, they will. So how do we all prepare for this eventuality. 17. Recommendations for building the Fediverse prior to the next mass migration: 1. BUILD instances -- lots of them 18. Building the Fediverse isn't just a matter of finding a Twitter or Facebook alternative. It's about building a ROBUST social media infrastructure that is protected from the whims of shareholders and governments. 19. Am I going to be sad about the "old" Fediverse? Yes I am. No one likes change but change to social media is coming. The great thing about ActivityPub is that we are not a slave to opaque algorithms. We can build better social media. 20. It's time ⏱️ Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter is imminent. It's costing him $44 billion. For the fraction of the cost, you can build the alternative. And it already works. /end thread @atomicpoet wonderful, thoughtful thread. Thank you! One thing I would point out is that it's not either-or. We don't have to lose the "old Fediverse" to be able to build it out as a robust, mainstream social network. There will always be nooks and crannies, some will not federate with the Big Network, some will, but the beauty of a standardized protocol with a bunch of independent implementations is that we *can* have those. And the beauty of no "real name policy" is alts. We can have both. @rysiek I agree with you. If you want to preserve part of the old Fediverse, nothing is stopping you from building an enclave. Nevertheless, the Big Network will change. @atomicpoet fully agreed. I just think it's important to keep that possibility in mind. The reason being: I've seen a lot of pushback against newcomers and changes that is not doing anyone any good. I feel if we communicated more clearly that it's not an either-or and we can have both, the pushback and internal fedi struggle around these changes would be lesser. Anyway, thanks again for the thread and for engaging! @atomicpoet You don’t buy Twitter for the software or even the infrastructure. You are buying their brand and user base. That’s why the issue of bots was important
@atomicpoet I'm one of today's new signups. This is a wonderful thread. Thank you.  @atomicpoet In any rate, this is a very informative thread and thanks for dojng this!  @atomicpoet I would like the Fediverse to be for everyone and have seen incumbents explain newbies rather aggressively how to behave, but I think the main reason people do not stick around is that we are substantive and boring. Those are explicit design choices of the current Fediverse systems. Twitter is an additive outrage machine (that not only benefited from the rise of Fascism, but also helped it), that is a subsystem the Fediverse does not have (yet). @atomicpoet A great thread. I've read a few suggestions about how the Fediverse should evolve into, but most proposals are akin to building another reddit. Each instance/sub has its own rules, requires moderation, and can still be flooded by bots. The difference is that there's no central admin, e.g. flat-earthers can stay in their own instance; but other instance can ban the whole lot instead of individuals. How's the Fediverse architect going to prevent org from automating instance and a/c? @atomicpoet What do you mean by the "old"? The point of the Fediverse is *voluntary federation*, no flood gates open up unless people on instances intend for it to happen. @amici I'm talking about culture. Even over the past 6 months, it's changed. This isn't a bad thing. Culture isn't something that is in stasis forever. @atomicpoet re instances, it's fine running your own (I did for a while) but it's lonely as you aren't as discoverable. Likewise it's global or nothing.  @atomicpoet That is exactly what I am doing:  @atomicpoet parts of the German government (mostly tech related) and some EU organisations are already on here, there's also a TV presenter (of factual/science programmes) who is on telly literally every week who posts here every so often.. @atomicpoet the EU actually has its own instance already @EU_Commission @atomicpoet as much as i dislike elon, he is right in this case. Its not even pro-russian tweet, its just being rational. He described the shortest path to peace. But whatever...
@atomicpoet just to point out that EU is already on mastodon: they opened an official instance earlier this April. And (less obvious) official EU accounts still posts daily updates. Not so much engagement so far but it’s game on. https://www.pcmag.com/news/eu-joins-mastodon-social-network-sets-up-its-own-server @atomicpoet I like running my own instance. I tried Mastodon on a VSP for a while but I eventually settled on Soapbox on my own gear. It was much easier to set up and I like what the devs are doing. I’m even running a couple of boys in my instance that I forked from another open source project. It’s been a fun process.
|
13. Over the past year, I've developed enough working knowledge to run a Fediverse instance. The best way to grow the Fediverse is to setup an instance. I'm by no means a sysadmin, but I've learn how to do it.