@lain @cwebber I’m so confused why you went with a backwards-incompatible protocol change instead of using keep-alive connections like I did in Mastodon when the benefits are almost exactly the same (only one server-to-server connection)...
@gargron @lain I suppose a keep-alive approach would work well too. I hadn't thought much about that. Maybe that is better.
The main upside of a websocket approach is cutting out some http headers in that case I guess then?
Gregory's Server
@gargron @lain I suppose a keep-alive approach would work well too. I hadn't thought much about that. Maybe that is better.
The main upside of a websocket approach is cutting out some http headers in that case I guess then?