Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
jramskov

@gruber @bouncing @stroughtonsmith I’m not convinced Apple would have switched by now - they argued a lot against it. Why would they do that if they were going to switch?
At least that seems strange to me, but I’m not a strategy mastermind 😄

22 comments
John Gruber replied to jramskov

@jramskov @bouncing @stroughtonsmith Apple was very clear in their argument, and they remain opposed to the mandate: it’s about the future, when they might come up with something better than USB-C.

jramskov replied to John

@gruber @bouncing @stroughtonsmith They also argued about all the existing kables that would become waste. I understand they want to control everything, but standards are generally a good thing and makes for a better experience for everyone. if they come up with a great new standard, it should be a new open standard that replaces USB-C for everyone.

Jimmy Callin replied to John

@gruber @jramskov @bouncing @stroughtonsmith 50% of their argument was also about the e-waste switching to usb-c would create. Based on their argument, it’s not at all clear when if ever they would switch theverge.com/2020/1/17/2107084

John Gruber replied to Jimmy

@callin @jramskov @bouncing @stroughtonsmith If they hadn’t switched, the new ProRes Log video capture wouldn’t be available. They wouldn’t be able to shoot their own keynotes on iPhones.

support.apple.com/guide/iphone

Steve Troughton-Smith replied to John

@gruber @callin @jramskov @bouncing just imagine all the new features and functionality they can boast about when they follow the rest of the EU’s specs! 😜

Niléane replied to John

@gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin @jramskov @bouncing I think Steve's point here is that the USB-C mandate hasn't prevented Apple from innovating as they argued it would.

It goes to show that the multi-trillion dollar company that they are will always be able to innovate, regardless of the regulations imposed on it. So perhaps they should just comply with them instead of acting like a spoiled child and relying on this disproven argument.

Geri 🎻 replied to Niléane

@nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin @jramskov @bouncing They became a multi-trillion dollar company for a reason.

They created the playground and now a 3rd party wanna say how to operate the swing. I’m disgusted.

Niléane replied to Geri

@gergely @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin @jramskov @bouncing If you created the playground, and it’s one of the only two playgrounds in the neighborhood, and you are actively making sure that only *your* kids can win or even play at the games on offer, then I’m sorry but you’re just a bully.

And I better hope the city steps in to ensure that every kid in that neighborhood can play.

Ken Kinder :clubtwit: replied to Niléane

@nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin @jramskov What confuses me about this discourse is that they are complying. This is what compliance looks like.

jramskov replied to Ken Kinder :clubtwit:

@bouncing @nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin Isn't the EC still looking at whether Apple is actually in compliance or not?

Ken Kinder :clubtwit: replied to jramskov

@jramskov @nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin Some legal jostling was always inevitable. And whatever tweaks come down the pike, I doubt they’ll be substantially different and I doubt they’ll satisfy the peanut gallery.

Also the fact that it’s far from obvious whether they’re in compliance is evidence of a badly written law.

jramskov replied to Ken Kinder :clubtwit:

@bouncing @nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin Perhaps, but I don’t completely buy that argument. Legal matters seems often take time. They have to make sure the judgement is right and fair. At the same time it is new regulation that everyone needs to become comfortable with.
Maybe it is badly written, I don’t know - I’m not a legal expert in any way.

Ken Kinder :clubtwit: replied to jramskov

@jramskov @nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin What would need to happen for it to be clearly good or bad? Or mixed?

jramskov replied to Ken Kinder :clubtwit:

@bouncing @nileane @gruber @stroughtonsmith @callin That’s not easy to answer 🙂 I hope it’ll reign in some of the extraordinary power these huge corporations have.

John Gruber replied to jramskov

@jramskov @bouncing @nileane @stroughtonsmith @callin None of this is a “legal matter”. The EU never found Apple guilty of violating any crime. None of this back and forth is happening through a court system. It’s all regulatory. Very different.

jramskov replied to John

@gruber @bouncing @nileane @stroughtonsmith @callin English isn’t my native language, I guess I’m just using “legal” slightly wrong 🙂

Jimmy Callin replied to John

@gruber @stroughtonsmith @jramskov @bouncing Now imagine being a business executive having to choose between the revenue of the MFA program, and shooting the keynote in a slightly better format.

John Gruber replied to Jimmy

@callin @stroughtonsmith @jramskov @bouncing MFA has been negligible for years. Really hasn’t been important to Apple since the iPod era. Lightning being proprietary didn’t make any serious money for Apple. Nada.

John Gruber replied to Jimmy

@callin @stroughtonsmith @jramskov @bouncing What does make money for Apple is selling their own branded $20-30 cables. They sell just as many USB-C cables as they ever did at Lightning’s peak.

Take It EV Podcast 🎙️ replied to Steve

@stroughtonsmith @gruber @callin @jramskov @bouncing my day job (security) will be indeed lot more interesting if they are forced to do all of this .

jramskov replied to Jimmy

@callin @gruber @bouncing @stroughtonsmith The e-waste argument I don’t buy at all. For one, they could’ve started by making their lightning cables more solid.
My mothers iPhone 8 works just fine, but it’s completely out of support. These devices are so powerful they can last for 10 years or more with just a battery replacement at some point.

Go Up