Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
lori

Honestly I think this idiom was pretty true at one point. That point is long gone because now everyone knows how lucrative selling user data is. Everyone that can get away with it will sell it. Unless, like some small dev with some tiny app on GitHub they do as a hobby, they aren't in it to make any money at all. But if you're a business and in the business of making money, you wanna make Two Money. And if you say you don't want to make Two Money, you might later decide to make Two Money, or sell to someone who wants to make Two Money. The only way to avoid Two Money is to use software that doesn't have data of yours to sell in the first place, which is extremely difficult. But you can't take this on faith alone.

2 comments
aburka 🫣

@lori the best part is that in the fullness of time, everything gets bought out by a private equity firm who will absolutely sell your data to make Two Money if that wasn't already happening

rakoo
@lori

That rule is true in the very mathematical sense: "A => B" doesn't automatically imply "B => A".

"If the sky is blue it means the sun must be up" doesn't imply the reverse ("if the sun is up the sky must be blue")

However the saying ir not enough, what's missing is "if it's a commercial product/service". That's important because if it's not then it's not happening, and if it's a libre software you can even take steps to *ensure* it is not happening.
@lori

That rule is true in the very mathematical sense: "A => B" doesn't automatically imply "B => A".

Go Up