@stux nodds in agreement
"#FreeSpeech" does not mean they have a right to get a free amplifier and bandwith and audience to start goebbeling out hatespeech...
Top-level
@stux nodds in agreement "#FreeSpeech" does not mean they have a right to get a free amplifier and bandwith and audience to start goebbeling out hatespeech... 8 comments
@nceladean @stux *nodds in agreement... They don't want "#FreezePeach" but #ConsequenceFreeSpeech because most people would react to them from shaking their head and leaving to getting smacked in the head and memed... Obviously the latter one is to discourage for obvious legal reasons... @nceladean @kkarhan @stux They want the freedom to use other people's private property to spew their hate speech, because they are essentially Communists who don't believe in private property unless it is their own private property. @badtux @nceladean @stux you wrote #facists wrong... - Because that's what they are! |
@kkarhan @stux
These "free" speech grifters always conveniently forget that free speech doesn't just apply to their hate speech and bigotry. It also includes the freedom to ignore others, the freedom to tell people to shut up, the freedom to shout them down, and the freedom to choose not to associate with someone for any reason
In actuality, what they want is not freedom of expression but the "freedom" to compel others to listen to them and to force them take their ideas seriously