@openculture Interesting, but I find it a bit disconcerting that this is presented as ”history” on the openculture site, instead of an “imagined history”, “fantasy history”, or maybe “timeline according to an interpretation of the chistian bible”.
Top-level
@openculture Interesting, but I find it a bit disconcerting that this is presented as ”history” on the openculture site, instead of an “imagined history”, “fantasy history”, or maybe “timeline according to an interpretation of the chistian bible”. No comments
|