@rupert @noodlemaz @JohnSullivan @realtegan I think their point is that they’re not willing to sacrifice brave women to the law for an unknown chance doing so would affect it.
A better route is to use social pressures to reduce the expression of these threats, which is why they said it needs to be men talking to other men, as the men that make these threats are more cowed by men’s disapproval than women’s hypothetical violence.
@WhiteCatTamer @rupert @JohnSullivan @realtegan yes, that, thank you.
I don't know how, from anything I've said, that you'd think I'm defending the law and/or those men.
I'm saying that, practically, beginning violent conflict with *men who are clearly prone to violence or are at least considering it* is not likely to end well. I am concerned for women's safety (and that of everyone else those shits would target).
Kicking people in the balls is not a good way to keep yourself safe. As a woman.
@WhiteCatTamer @rupert @JohnSullivan @realtegan yes, that, thank you.
I don't know how, from anything I've said, that you'd think I'm defending the law and/or those men.
I'm saying that, practically, beginning violent conflict with *men who are clearly prone to violence or are at least considering it* is not likely to end well. I am concerned for women's safety (and that of everyone else those shits would target).