Gregory's Server@Runyan50 @Impossible_PhD How about both?
It's a tool for defense. Nothing more. It reckless to be unarmed when the enemy is armed to the teeth and only sees targets. We have to close the gap in both weapons and survival skills.
|
8 comments
 @MxVerda @Runyan50 @Impossible_PhD I was referring to those able. Of course I don't expect those not able to do it. Don't try to push us to not be violent. It did nothing to stop the Nazis. Only bullets can do that. @MxVerda @Runyan50 @Impossible_PhD There is still a gap that needs to be closed...and we are at war. @MxVerda @Runyan50 @Impossible_PhD And of course. I at no point argue only fighters matter. But a warfooting is required.  @FinalOverdrive you assume a lot of my motives, my douche. @MxVerda I mean under some circumstances I will accept dude. Might not have single fixed identity. But you're going to insult me, call me a cunt, bitch, etc. |
@FinalOverdrive
Whether or not I agree with your assumptions, not everyone physically and mentally can wield a weapon effectively,
much less in a crisis, much less without training before now, much less even want to.
“All or nothing” is a shit strategy.
Disabled people (of all stripes) exist and can help in different ways. You need infrastructure, logistics, medicine, etc.
Yes, teach everyone how to activate the safety on a gun. Give them other training if they want, but focus on what will actually help 80% of the gd time.
(Even if it didn’t, people still have different skills and needs.)
@Runyan50 @Impossible_PhD
@FinalOverdrive
Whether or not I agree with your assumptions, not everyone physically and mentally can wield a weapon effectively,
much less in a crisis, much less without training before now, much less even want to.
“All or nothing” is a shit strategy.
Disabled people (of all stripes) exist and can help in different ways. You need infrastructure, logistics, medicine, etc.