Gregory's Server@neauoire I don't get it, is their complaint that an assembly language isn't a high level language? I wonder where they figure high level abstractions come from. There's nothing stopping someone from writing a simple compiler targeting uxn if they want these things?
@aeva actually this is not about Uxn, it's using forth as an example of what they call "pseudo-simplicity", I'm seeing these little jabs at languages that are a bit more domain specific. Using terms like "church of minimalism" has this reactionary connotation like more languages is worst somehow, and that different scopes can't coexist.