Gregory's Server@Gargron This is a possible answer I was thinking of. The other is, that perhaps scanning a negative yields better results, nowadays, than right shoot with mid-quality DSLR.
|
Top-level
@Gargron This is a possible answer I was thinking of. The other is, that perhaps scanning a negative yields better results, nowadays, than right shoot with mid-quality DSLR. 1 comment
|
@shevek Negatives have insane resolution, that's true. And a used analog camera is much cheaper than a DSLR that shoots comparable resolution.