@scy FYI, I am not totally sure whether I trust my...

@scy FYI, I am not totally sure whether I trust my own initial take on this. I find it super suspicious, but framing it as "going proprietary" is too definitive for me to stand by what I originally said in the form of a joke.

Like 20 October at 16:02 | Wall-to-wall | Open on chaos.social

2 comments

scy

@n0toose Well, I'm neither saying "Bitwarden is going proprietary", nor "n0toose is saying that Bitwarden is going proprietary", just "people in the issue are speculating that Bitwarden might go proprietary", and from what I've seen, that's correct.

My personal opinion is: this smells. It especially smells that they need to protect stuff from the GPL, and that they're locking the issue. If there has simply been miscommunication, you'd expect them to start a conversation, not end one.

20 October at 16:52 | Open on chaos.social

Christoph Petrausch

@scy @n0toose on the other hand, once the wrong communities see an issue, a civilian conversation is nearly impossible.

20 October at 18:22 | Open on norden.social