Just to clarify our stance: We're happy to accept large free/libre software projects migrating to Codeberg. This can even happen in a hurry. And we're ready to help with the migration as good as possible.
But to reiterate: Hosting proprietary content on Codeberg is not allowed.
And: Causing excessive traffic to mostly proprietary content is even less allowed.
Thanks.
@Codeberg My estimate would be that github can sustain a lot more bandwidth than codeberg ever will, but correct me if I am wrong. No offense, but M$ has the $-sign in the name.
So hosting an "excessive bandwidth" repository probably just means the excessive bandwidth M$ managers had in their inbox due to friends and lobbyists complaining about said repository?