@kornel @stonebear And my post is not about 2FA. The point is not that, and you continue to see past it.
Top-level
@kornel @stonebear And my post is not about 2FA. The point is not that, and you continue to see past it. 5 comments
@mattly @stonebear @janl As for your post: The fact that you don't fit a definition of a "supplier" doesn't mean you're not involved in this software-thing, only that the label given to it doesn't properly describe who the participants are. @mattly @stonebear @janl 2. And you've used "FOSS" term for what is OSS, but that's not surprising, since it was designed to be confused. @kornel @mattly @stonebear for the love of god, please accept that you misread the post and stop. |
@mattly @stonebear I've just responded to a single toot that @janl boosted where you wanted to disable 2FA in a tantrum. It's just not a sensible reaction to a reasonable requirement.
There are much bigger problems, but your defiance isn't solving them, and would just create more if 2FA wasn't mandatory.