Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jeen

@tomjennings @paninid if you search for "austria hungary space" a result showing a fictional description of Austria-Hungary in space is arguably just as accurate as independent factual results about Austria in space and Hungary in spcace. Ymmv.

6 comments
Andreas K

@abrokenjester @tomjennings @paninid

The problem is the AI summary on top.

The results below make it more or less clear that they are about a fictional game.

The AI summary is misleading by leaving out any hint that it summarizes fiction.

And that is basically the issue with "AI" summaries. They don't get the context. They are convincing sounding text manipulation without understanding.

(Irrelevant fun fact: we did have a "real" colony in Asia for less than a decade.)

Ash_Crow

@yacc143 @abrokenjester @tomjennings @paninid it's a "featured snippet", an excerpt from a relevant page. Google has had that for years, it's not the same as the new "AI Overview" bullshit.

Niko Trimmel :veriqueer:

@Ash_Crow @yacc143 @abrokenjester @tomjennings @paninid exactly. This has absolutely nothing to do with AI and all with literacy. Click on the link and check the source. It being hosted on Fandom should give enough clues on itself that it's fictional.

Andreas K

@abrokenjester

Plesse note that humans get these clues often from subtle things like in which website we find a certain text, potentially even the URL. Or what other links are offered on the page.

So in a way the summary might be a perfect example of LLM AI art its best, being used totally wrong.

It's a bit like my personal position on computer translations: they are generally not good enough to translate something and hand it out to unsuspecting victims.

@tomjennings @paninid

Andreas K

@abrokenjester
OTOH computer translations can be extremely useful when an user is confronted with a text in a language he does not know: between knowing three context, the so so translation, searching for clarification on the web, asking clarification, you can usually get the meaning, without needing someone who knows the language.
@tomjennings @paninid

Andreas K

@abrokenjester
Now the point is, the "AI" has to work under human supervision so the human can interpret and verify its results. If you are not in the spam business, you generally care for a correct result, and stochastic algorithms are exactly incapable to provide that one guarantee.
@tomjennings @paninid

Go Up