@abrokenjester Plesse note that humans get these clues...

Coach Pāṇini ®'s posts Post Back to profile

Plesse note that humans get these clues often from subtle things like in which website we find a certain text, potentially even the URL. Or what other links are offered on the page.

So in a way the summary might be a perfect example of LLM AI art its best, being used totally wrong.

It's a bit like my personal position on computer translations: they are generally not good enough to translate something and hand it out to unsuspecting victims.

@tomjennings @paninid

Like 2 September at 6:21 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.social

2 comments

Andreas K

@abrokenjester
OTOH computer translations can be extremely useful when an user is confronted with a text in a language he does not know: between knowing three context, the so so translation, searching for clarification on the web, asking clarification, you can usually get the meaning, without needing someone who knows the language.
@tomjennings @paninid

2 September at 6:24 | Open on mastodon.social

Andreas K

@abrokenjester
Now the point is, the "AI" has to work under human supervision so the human can interpret and verify its results. If you are not in the spam business, you generally care for a correct result, and stochastic algorithms are exactly incapable to provide that one guarantee.
@tomjennings @paninid

2 September at 6:27 | Open on mastodon.social