@jpaskaruk @jerry @derickr @ilijastuden @Gargron I didnβt say βinstead of.β
Top-level
@jpaskaruk @jerry @derickr @ilijastuden @Gargron I didnβt say βinstead of.β 3 comments
@Crell @ramsey @jerry @derickr @ilijastuden @Gargron Silly me, I thought it was about listening to users who are being harassed and taking our cues from them. They've asked for one feature at least that seems like a very good idea to me - the ability to have only people you follow able to reply to you. It's 2024; we can do that. As I see it, it would involve an update to the protocol that rejected reply attempts, and have the originating server not keep the toot. Send in the freedom bros... @jpaskaruk @Crell @jerry @derickr @ilijastuden @Gargron Weβre not arguing with you. Weβre agreeing. |
@ramsey @jpaskaruk @jerry @derickr @ilijastuden @Gargron It's all about increasing the cost of being an asshole. That can be done through both technical and social means, and they can be reinforcing. But both are necessary.