Gregory's Server@freemo I wasn't referring to you personally or trying to sound aggressive. I mean the Supreme Court ruling was due to Musk disobeying a just order to ban accounts related to Brazil's attempted coup last year - which makes it much less about censorship and much more grounded than abusive orders from foreign governments that he had no problem implementing.
|
3 comments
@freemo sure, but - also technically -the whole of Twitter wasn't blocked because of those unbanned accounts. It was because, after that, Musk closed its offices here and refused to name a legal representative in the country. I do think that Musk provoked this situation so he could fire some people and still pose as a hero.  @nande I wouldnt doubt for a second he is playing some sort of game. Either he wants attention and free advertising or wants to save some money. |
@nande All good, all im saying is technically its still about censorship. Brazils govt wanted something censored, musk didnt want it censored. Im mot saying musk was in the right, or that brazil was. Just saying it was fubdementally still about censorship.