@esther honestly, sharks are so old on astronomical...

Esther is looking for a server's posts Post Back to profile

@esther honestly, sharks are so old on astronomical timescales that "things younger than sharks" includes several nebula, galaxies, stars (obviously), planets, the rings of Saturn (no, I'm not joking) and half the things on earth.

Like 30 August at 11:13 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.chaosfield.at

3 comments

Esther is looking for a server

@dequbed I knew about the rings. it's just that stars always feel like they should be older than anything else, even though that's absolutely not the case often

30 August at 11:15 | Open on strangeobject.space

nadja

@esther fair :)
Yes, stars seem like unchanging static things when really, humans are just babies in the timescales of the universe ^^

30 August at 11:18 | Open on mastodon.chaosfield.at

Ariaflame

@dequbed @esther With stars it depends on their size, the bigger they are, the faster they go through the life cycle and polaris is pretty big. Live fast, die young.

30 August at 16:10 | Open on masto.ai

Go Up