@simon Saw this pass by, and the combo
"It did pretty well!
[...]
Since I hadn't checked the conversion for correctness..."
is kinda the thing us LLM detractors like to latch on.
Top-level
2 comments
@adriano but if they chose not to consider how much time this would save in terms of doing the work to produce a verified, 100% correct HTML version of that PDF that’s on them at this point |
@adriano sure, that’s why I specifically called it out - they’re not wrong about that kind of thing