Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
the Amygdalai Lama

@researchfairy @currentbias
.
when they say “efficient,” that means a secret project, some evil bullshit. It’s not an adjective that applies to harm reduction.

2 comments
the Amygdalai Lama

@researchfairy @currentbias
nobody minds if you feed and house them “inefficiently,” as long as you fucking try, good doesn’t need to be “efficient,” to be allowed.

johnaldis

I *do* want people fed and housed “efficiently” in the sense that long-term I want the most people fed and housed comfortably, which means achieving that comfort by the expenditure of the least resources per person. For example, making/keeping people poor is inefficient as it makes them spend more (it’s expensive to be poor, as per Vimes). So an “efficient” system needs to be against poverty. I agree that perfect is the enemy of good, but efficient *is* better with the right definition of value.

Go Up