Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
The research fairy's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Claire

@researchfairy "ok you see the free market produces better solutions because of competition, so that's why we're giving an exclusive contract for providing this public service to a single company"

18 August at 19:35 | Wall-to-wall | Open on sakurajima.moe
4 comments
econads

@waitworry @researchfairy
The trains are privatised which is why if I don't like the train company I will drive to the next county and take the train in a completely different direction from where I want to go.

18 August at 20:27 | Open on mendeddrum.org
Jane Fraser

@econads @waitworry @researchfairy Rail’s an interesting case. Allowing multiple, potentially private operators, to directly compete, can have benefits, but rail infrastructure needs to be something like a public good to allow such a market. Railway privatisation results in a natural monopoly, which worsens outcomes. In effect, a market requires public ownership, which is not what economic orthodoxy would indicate.

18 August at 22:39 | Open on mastodon.nz
econads

@janef0421 @waitworry @researchfairy
Yes thank you that was basically my point. Privatisation doesn't work for the passenger with rail, and I doubt it would even if different operators would run the same routes.
The competition generated by the privatisation of in theory rail serves the government because it can get bids for the lowest cost, but the government is not passengers. Temporarily nationalised services when an operator goes out of business tend to improve the outcomes.

19 August at 8:38 | Open on mendeddrum.org
mathew

@waitworry @researchfairy "The free market is much more efficient than government could ever be. We have to get rid of any publicly-owned option so that the free market can be viable."

18 August at 21:41 | Open on universeodon.com
Go Up