Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Joan Westenberg

If anyone’s wondering what the dude who sang “chocolate rain” is up to these days, he’s dropping absolute bangers about housing and he’s fucking right

234 comments
Ericka Simone

@Daojoan never forget - years later we found out Chocolate Rain was about racism against Black people.

enoch_exe_inc

@ErickaSimone @Daojoan It even contains references to certain racist studies in The Bell Curve.

Lunar 🛸 ♾

@ErickaSimone @Daojoan I'm honestly surprised it didn't get picked up on sooner

missed_sla

@ErickaSimone @Daojoan Wait, that wasn't common knowledge? Did anybody listen to the words? Yeah, it was performed in a funny way but the lyrics were pretty clear.

Ericka Simone

@missed_sla @Daojoan I mean, *we* knew. But people didn’t believe it until he confirmed it in an interview later.

Sashin

@ErickaSimone @Daojoan He's released a number of bangers on economics since! Like Mamma Economy and Fiat Fire!!!

Viraptor

@Daojoan he's also TayZonday on Twitch if you want to catch him live.

there is beauty in simplicity

@viraptor @Daojoan yeah and he's a fan of Overwatch Esports :ow: :ow_lucio:

Dave Spector

@Daojoan this is a crisis created by private equity firms who’ve spent hundreds of billions hoovering up every kind of housing stock across the country, as well as trailer parks and apartment complexes

Then, they’ll do what they always do: squeeze every last dollar out of the asset — then they’ll leave hollowed out towns/neighborhoods with destroyed housing stock when they’re done and then demand huge tax breaks for their ill-gotten gains.

Unregulated capitalism is social darnwinism writ large

Matthaus Woolard

@Daojoan yer we have the same issues in NZ as well. I woud also limit short term rental (airBNB) to only permit if the freehold title owners live on sight and are onsite during the stay. (Eg a farm can have an airBnB cabin but a townhouse or apartment in a city can’t be an AirBNB, a room within a home can be though)

Perspective

@hishnash @Daojoan

Same crap in Canada.
It's like Monopoly on steroids 😞

#housing

Jennifer Moore

@hishnash

Interesting idea!

Would you allow the situation where someone AirBnBs their _own_ house while they're away?

Zimmie

@unchartedworlds @hishnash That’s potentially open to abuse. “I live there, I just travel 364 days out of the year.”

Some occupancy ratio based on the national minimum paid time off could be interesting. If federal standards say full-time workers get two weeks of PTO per year, you can rent out your house while traveling for up to two weeks per six months.

Billy Smith

@bob_zim @unchartedworlds @hishnash

In London, people would buy a flat on a mortgage to let it out for Airbnb.

The SME model for an Airbnb landlord.

There was one Airbnb locally that a couple of friends used, that had one person renting a room permanently on a cheaper rent, to avoid being hit by the local legislation.

They were not the flat owner, and told my friends this, but when dealing with any bureaucracy, acted as the owner's agent.

Loopholes will exist and will have to be patched.

Matthaus Woolard

@BillySmith I would say the title owner must be resident and that the title owner can not own any other property.

Most of the AirBNB investment owners aim to own many properties limiting it to only being permitted to own a single one would cut things down a lot.

Billy Smith

@hishnash

Which was the original pitch made when Airbnb got started.

Use your spare room to generate extra income.

What it became afterwards is a different question, but that's always the case when VC funding demands the ridiculous ROI that VC funds have promised their investors.

Jennifer Moore

@bob_zim

Yes, some kind of ratio cap would make sense. I was thinking of people who really _do_ live there most of the time :-)

@hishnash

Zimmie

@unchartedworlds @hishnash Yeah, it’s just that when proposing policy, you have to think like an evil djinn. That’s basically what billionaires are, after all: amoral, insatiable hunger for *more* (djinni are the people of the fire, after all), and entertained by tricking people.

Matthaus Woolard

@unchartedworlds The simpler one is to ensure the tall the freehold owners only own this property.

Eg you cant have short term rental on a title if any of the title owners own any other property. This would shutdown 99% of the AirBnB property investors.

Matthaus Woolard

@bob_zim @unchartedworlds The solution for this is constrain this to people that only own a single property and do not rent any other. (gov in NZ knows were you rent and what you own)

winter

@bob_zim @unchartedworlds @hishnash In Montana, you're required to occupy your house for >50% of the year if you want to air BNB it. That prevents it from getting too out of hand (in Montana, anyway).

Matthaus Woolard

@unchartedworlds I don't consider that AirBnB but rather house sitting (typically you do not pay to do this... you are commonly intact paid to house sit, water plants, feed pets, etc).

Desert Guy

@hishnash @Daojoan I like this. I thought Air B&B was a cool idea when it was a homeowner renting a guest house or spare room. But it's turned into a way uglier monster.

Matthaus Woolard

@desertgoalie @Daojoan yer the good AirBnB I have used have been this, were its a cabin or guest house on a vineyard etc were the owners live there... they meat you when you turn up, they pop over with a local cheese board and even pre-fire the wood fired hot tub so its all ready for you to do some midnight stare gazing.

P J Evans

@Daojoan
Turning housing that could be owner-occupied (or renter-occupied) into short-term rentals, AKA motels...

GhostOnTheHalfShell

@Daojoan

Housing as an investment, with the expectation that its value rises over time is *inflation* by any other name. It defies logic and is unsustainable, distorting cost of living generationally.

Some how prices need to drop and all the investment goals people use houses for (retirement nest egg) need to be replaced with other mechanisms.

oh and people with so much money they can buy entire blocks w cash need to have their wealth networks dismantled. Anti Trust will help with that.

Kevin Sæverūdsøy :donor:

@Daojoan AltTxt:

There is no American "housing crisis" — there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.

The policy solution is simple: poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.

Allowing unlimited non-local capital to supply-hoard vacant housing is simply anti-resident eugenics. Current residents are too poor, so replace them with richer ones— even if it causes widespread homelessness, forced migration and absurd energy costs for the displaced to commute. It's as discriminatory as Federal Housing Administration redlining of black neighborhoods in the 1940s.

#AltTxt #ALT4you

@Daojoan AltTxt:

There is no American "housing crisis" — there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.

The policy solution is simple: poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.

Potung Thul

@severud @Daojoan

Tag that post (to which I am replying) with #AltText and #Alt4You so blind people can find it.

iwein

@Daojoan that txt looks familiar. Still true though.

Spatula

@Daojoan
We also need to ban corporations from buying single-family homes.

I was told a while back that Meta was on a buying spree in and around our neighborhood, buying up houses with cash, pushing real living and breathing people out of the market.

@CassandraVert

🍉

@BassRck5000 um sorry to burst your bubble (no pun intended) but this is happening under Dems too. They're all beholden to corporations.

Gurre Vildskägg

@Daojoan
sure, do all that. But also: build more effin' housing. Build it sustainably: full walkability & bikeability, dense enough to support local shops & services for daily needs within walking distance, dense enough and with a structure to make quality transit a real thing, and with parks etc.

#UrbanizeTheSuburbs #yimby

kayenne

@Gurre @Daojoan have you seen the home inspector youtube shorts? Arizona is building housing and it's almost falling apart before it gets sold

Gurre Vildskägg

@riking @Daojoan
I've seen a few. They are WILD.
It's more scam than construction.

Gurre Vildskägg

@riking @Daojoan
that is to say:
construction rules & inspections are a must. That last major earthquake in Turkey? the city that handled it well, few building collapses etc, they actually had inspectors that did their jobs and politicians that backed them up.

Dave Mandl

@riking @Gurre @Daojoan Interesting. Do you have a sample link? Thanks.

david_chisnall

@Daojoan I’m not sure how true this is in the US, but in the UK a lot of the ‘shortage’ is caused by geographically limited indirect subsidies.

It’s cheaper to fly to the US from London than from one of the airports in the West of England, even though the distance is a few hundred miles longer. There’s over an order of magnitude more per-capita spending on public transport in London than in the North of England. There’s no requirement on BT OpenReach to provide high-speed Internet everywhere and so it’s clustered in places that already have high population densities.

If you want to set up a company in a place that’s easy for international visitors to access, you are constrained to the south east. If you want to be able to work remotely, you are constrained to existing cities (unless you have enough spare cash to pay for a few kilometres of fibre).

There are lot of houses for sale outside of the south east for low prices, and a lot that have been on the market for a year or more, but they aren’t where the jobs are. The previous government’s insistence that civil service workers go back into the office after two years of proving that they could work effectively without doing so made this worse.

Support in the tax system for remote work would go a long way. I’d love to see a 10% payroll tax for office workers who are required to be in the office and who do not need access to specialised equipment.

@Daojoan I’m not sure how true this is in the US, but in the UK a lot of the ‘shortage’ is caused by geographically limited indirect subsidies.

It’s cheaper to fly to the US from London than from one of the airports in the West of England, even though the distance is a few hundred miles longer. There’s over an order of magnitude more per-capita spending on public transport in London than in the North of England. There’s no requirement on BT OpenReach to provide high-speed Internet everywhere and...

AzureArmageddon

@Daojoan All these years I've just been seeing him in random YouTube comments sections being unrelentingly based.

canleaf08 ⌘ ✅

@Daojoan Limit money immigration! Limit the movement of rich people. Seize uninhabited buildings!

Radical Resilience Film

@Daojoan please don't forget #AltText -especially as so much of the information is in the text in the image

🍉

@Daojoan if you actually listen to the lyrics to "Chocolate Rain" you'll realize he's always been based af

Alon

@Daojoan This isn't "truth," this is NIMBY bullshit masquerading as social policy. He's proposing taxes on rentals, but not on home ownership, so renters will end up paying more than homeowners. Then he repeats the canard about vacant housing, when American housing vacancy rates are low; New York has a regular housing survey with a line item for units that are vacant because they're held for occasional or recreational use, and they're 1% of the supply. Less NIMBYism, more housing construction.

Chris

@Alon
"Poison pill" means the taxes are so great on the rental owners that it becomes untenable to own a house just to rent it to others. That doesn't increase rents, it increases available housing supply for people to own a home that the can live in.
He's proposing a tax so people can become homeowners.

sidereal

@Alon @Daojoan NYC is a unique case; in Seattle, closer to where Mr. Zonday lives, there are about 40 empty apartments for every homeless person. What we are experiencing is basically a capital strike.

TechTrav

@Daojoan this is really thought-provoking. all my life, I've been a die-hard "limited government" kind of guy. this gives me a peek into the idea that "the other side" might have a point. thanks for sharing.

argv minus one

@techtrav

The idea of “limited government” has this problem in all kinds of ways: pollution, monopolization, discrimination, misconduct by local police, and so on.

Jennifer

@Daojoan I don't know who he is but he's totally correct.

Ryan Germann :verified:

@Daojoan also if Governments took over the "basic, decent housing" market and built millions of new homes AND prohibited foreign "investment" in those properties AND held a lottery for whom could buy those homes AND restricted who was qualified to purchase those homes on the resale market, housing might get closer to being affordable for all. This doesn't rule out a private housing market for those with the means, but their homes would be more affordable as well.

The basics of human existence should not be subject to "market forces".

@Daojoan also if Governments took over the "basic, decent housing" market and built millions of new homes AND prohibited foreign "investment" in those properties AND held a lottery for whom could buy those homes AND restricted who was qualified to purchase those homes on the resale market, housing might get closer to being affordable for all. This doesn't rule out a private housing market for those with the means, but their homes would be more affordable as well.

Mike Hicks

@Daojoan I think he's basically talking about a vacancy tax, which is one tool in the toolbox, but there is no single magic bullet. We need to build much more housing -- I know the area where I live needs to build about 15,000 units per year to keep up with growth.

Over in California, a legal organization that has backed housing reforms has a tracker for cities throughout the state showing whether they're in compliance or not. Most places need to build build build cities.fairhousingelements.org

@Daojoan I think he's basically talking about a vacancy tax, which is one tool in the toolbox, but there is no single magic bullet. We need to build much more housing -- I know the area where I live needs to build about 15,000 units per year to keep up with growth.

Over in California, a legal organization that has backed housing reforms has a tracker for cities throughout the state showing whether they're in compliance or not. Most places need to build build build cities.fairhousingelements.org

Lufty :verified_trans:

@Daojoan No alt text? Really?

Here's what the screenshotted twitter comment from Tay Zonday ( @tayzonday ) says:

"There is no American "housing crisis"- there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.

The policy solution is simple: Poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.

Allowing unlimited non-local capital to supply-hoard vacant housing is simply anti-resident eugenics. Current residents are too poor, so replace them with richer ones- even if it causes widespread homelessness, forced migration and absurd energy costs for the displaced to commute. It's as discriminatory as Federal Housing Administration redlining of black neighborhoods in the 1940s."

@Daojoan No alt text? Really?

Here's what the screenshotted twitter comment from Tay Zonday ( @tayzonday ) says:

"There is no American "housing crisis"- there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.

The policy solution is simple: Poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.

Roundcat

@Daojoan “Mama economy” was my favorite song of his, and that was about the 2010s economy.

Cy
Tay Zonday is my motherfucking spirit animal. That is wicked sick.
lin11c

@Daojoan
Exactly. We don't need millions of new homes, there are millions being warehoused with TAX BREAKS! Also, nationwide rent stabilization, it's time.

Jim Jones

@Daojoan Alt Text 1/2

"@tayzonday:

There is no American "housing crisis" -- there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.

The policy solution is simple: poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force the immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.

Allowing unlimited non-local capital to supply-hoard vacant housing is simply anti-resident eugenics."

Jim Jones

@Daojoan Alt Text 2/2

"Current residents are too poor, so replace them with richer ones -- even if it causes widespread homelessness, forced migration and absurd energy costs for the displaced to commute. It's as discriminatory as Federal Housing Administration relining of black neighborhoods in the 1940s."

argv minus one

@Daojoan

And everybody thinks Trump is going to fix this? 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

clacke: looking for something 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛

@argv_minus_one @Daojoan Everyone? I sure hope not!

I didn't look at the details, but it sounded to me like he wanted to recreate the subprime mortgage crisis.

jeanthejust

@Daojoan I agree with one exception. Could you please let the "poison pill" exempt people who are housing relatives. I bought my SIL a house in the midwest when she couldn't afford to live on her retirement. I am not rich enough to buy her a house in California, but she is living in a lovely bungalow in Indiana.

Karate Gum

@jeanthejust In a properly equitable housing environment, your SIL would be able to afford that lovely bungalow.

SKC

@Daojoan alt text:

Post from Tay Zonday

There is no American “housing crisis"— there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.

The policy solution is simple: poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.

SKC

@Daojoan

Continued alt text:

Allowing unlimited non-local capital to supply-hoard vacant housing is simply anti-resident eugenics. Current residents are too poor, so replace them with richer ones— even if it causes widespread homelessness, forced migration and absurd energy costs for the displaced to commute. It's as discriminatory as Federal Housing Administration redlining of black neighborhoods in the 1940s.

BrazMogu (i.e. Bruno Guedes)

@Daojoan
Chocolate Rain
Supply and demand is a lie they tell
Chocolate Rain
To keep you complacent in the face of hell

(not surprising, Chocolate Rain was an absolutely based song about systemic racism; very satisfying, still)

Noir Lover

@Daojoan yep tax warehousing, Airbnb and create piede-a-terre tax. And stop tax abatements for luxury housing.

Bubba Harrison

@Daojoan
Bill Clinton signed a law preventing the number of public housing units from increasing more than the number that existed on October 1, 1999
He'll be honored at the Democratic convention this week.
nurseledcare.phmc.org/advocacy

violetmadder

@Daojoan

No one should be allowed to own a residence where they do not actually reside.

That alone would change all KINDS of things.

Cy
Furthermore, no one should be allowed to own a business where they do not bizz!

@Daojoan@mastodon.social
Fjord In Progress

@Daojoan @PacificNic same image about the underlying, purposeful cause of the lack of affordable housing with #AltText

Martijn Vos

Another interesting proposal I've heard, and quite like is: corporations are not allowed to buy homes. Ever.

They can own them if they build them (which is necessary for organisations that build social housing, for example), but if they sell, they have to sell to people. A bank may come to own a house when the original owner can't pay the mortgage anymore, but if the bank wants to sell the house, they have to sell it to a person. Other than that, any corporation that wants to own houses, has to build them themselves thereby expanding the housing supply, instead of shrinking it by buying existing houses.

Another interesting proposal I've heard, and quite like is: corporations are not allowed to buy homes. Ever.

They can own them if they build them (which is necessary for organisations that build social housing, for example), but if they sell, they have to sell to people. A bank may come to own a house when the original owner can't pay the mortgage anymore, but if the bank wants to sell the house, they have to sell it to a person. Other than that, any corporation that wants to own houses, has to build...

Lurgue Ftanh

@Daojoan dude this goes hard as fuck. Tay Zonday for president.

mizblueprint

@Daojoan
@Angle
Allowing houses to become distributed hotels via "vacation rental" use (or "STR", short term rental) has locked up a significant share of existing dwelling units. Some communities have tens or hundreds of thousands of units no longer available for permanent housing. Why build new at enormous cost when the supply already exists?

Angle

@mizblueprint @Daojoan Mmm. I'm not entirely sure this problem can be solved by just passing laws, at least not unless you're willing to pass a lot of them. Like, the underlying problem here is that a small number of people has such a concentration of wealth and power that their minor conveniences and luxuries (Vacation Homes and short term rentals) are valued above other peoples basic necessities (Having a house to live in).

Angle

@mizblueprint @Daojoan And whatever laws you pass, you can expect them to run up against this basic reality. The wealthy and powerful want what they want, they don't give a damn about anyone else, and their desires will distort everything they can reach. The law, the market, the media, you name it. So, pass a law banning short term rentals, and I expect you'll start seeing loopholes, exceptions, workarounds, and just flat out lack of enforcement immediately, as long as the money demands it. :/

Angle

@mizblueprint @Daojoan As a friend points out though, we don't have a lot of other options. It's either try and pass laws, give up, or resort to extra-legal action - which probably means a breakdown in law and order that the rich will be most able to take advantage of... :/

Angle

@mizblueprint @Daojoan I suppose there's always the option of 'venture out into the wilderness to build a new society from scratch'? But that kinda requires resources and organization, and if we had that, we probably wouldn't need to do it... XD

pam_1965

@Angle @mizblueprint @Daojoan

The ultimate goal (I believe) is to create a prison slave-labor class to replace the lower working class. What better way to accomplish this than outlawing homelessness and making housing totally out of reach economically.

Angle

@pamleo65 @mizblueprint @Daojoan I don't think they've thought it through that much. Just a million instances of people being selfish and stupid.

Angle

@pamleo65 @mizblueprint @Daojoan It doesn't really make a difference - that system isn't going to scale well. It's just a question of how miserable things get, and when. :/

mizblueprint

@Angle @pamleo65 @Daojoan
I served 3 terms on Napa City Council, and before that, 6 years on the County Planning Commission and about 8 years on the City Planning Commission. Affordable housing was and will always be - a big issue there. Second homes for wealthy Bay Area residents are also a big issue. Each city and community is different - so local land use and zoning is important. Some states have begun regulating land use - such as Oregon eliminating exclusive single family zoning.

mizblueprint

@Angle
@Daojoan
One of the first studies on this that I read was the LAANE report on impacts of short term rentals in LA. Here's a link to the pdf. laane.org/research/short-term-
Cities that have now eliminated or curtailed short term rentals include New York, SF, LA, Dallas, Honolulu, Chattanooga, Las Vegas, Napa, Barcelona, Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam...many others in the works. Building housing is expensive. Preserving existing housing is essential.

Angle

@mizblueprint @Daojoan Oh huh, neat! Has there been a study on the effects? Of the cities that have done this, how effectively have they actually managed to prevent the practice, and how much has it reduced housing prices?

mizblueprint

@Angle @Daojoan
It has not reduced housing costs in Napa City or County. But in a destination county with a total population of about 130k people, strict urban limit lines, and protected agricultural zoning, preserving existing housing for residents is essential. I've read that NY is seeing a drop in rental costs. Barcelona was being slammed with visitors, and suffered a big loss of rental housing. Their ban is going into effect by 2028. cities-today.com/barcelona-set

0ddj0bb

@Daojoan putting these actions as a form of eugenics is to me very clarifying.

Much like systemic racism isnt about overt actions but rather functional outcomes.

Cavyherd

@Daojoan

Hm. Colorado is currently trying to figure out how to fix the property tax & housing market crises. 🤔 😈

sparseMatrix 📻

@Daojoan

He unironically says this as if actual redlining doesn't still happen.

Nocta

@Daojoan I mean, Chocolate Rain is also an absolute banger, so...

Strypey

@Daojoan
> he’s dropping absolute bangers about housing

Reminds me of whole neighbourhoods getting demolished after the GFC. In a desperate attempt to reinflate the housing bubble, and keep prices artificially high, by reducing supply. Like the house hoarding the “chocolate rain” dude talks about, this is absurd. It's no way to run an economy, and the only people who benefit are the financialist aristocracy and their running dogs.

the vessel of morganna

@Daojoan Tay Zonday was always on some real stuff, the meme categorisation really made people gloss over it though:/

Aliz

@Daojoan something something raise your neighbourhood insurance rates

hex

@Daojoan pretty on point.

IMHO, the solution is squatters rights. Squatters rights leaves the least room for government fuckery because it's controlled by people directly and makes housing free to those who need it. But that's just my € .02

Sean Boyer 🇵🇸 FREE PALESTINE

@Daojoan
Hey! Here's an #alt4u if you'd be interested in adding it to the image for the vision impaired:

Screen grab of a tweet:
Tay Zonday @tayzonday 6h

There is no American "housing crisis"— there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.
The policy solution is simple: poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.
Allowing unlimited non-local capital to supply- hoard vacant housing is simply anti-resident eugenics. Current residents are too poor, so replace them with richer ones- even if it causes widespread homelessness, forced migration and absurd energy costs for the displaced to commute. It's as discriminatory as Federal Housing Administration redlining of black neighborhoods in the 1940s.

@Daojoan
Hey! Here's an #alt4u if you'd be interested in adding it to the image for the vision impaired:

Screen grab of a tweet:
Tay Zonday @tayzonday 6h

There is no American "housing crisis"— there's a supply-hoarding crisis to rig local market prices above the liquidity of local buyer capital.
The policy solution is simple: poison-pill tax all non-occupant-owned housing to force immediate sale to local buyers at actual market rates.
Allowing unlimited non-local capital to supply- hoard vacant housing...

Steven Bodzin bike & subscribe

@Daojoan I want a pied a terre tax but this post overstates things a lot. There is no significant supply hoarding. And there is no reason to think that owner occupied housing is inherently better (edit: especially if people have to spend a huge part of their income to buy it). Many people don't have the capital to maintain a building.

The basic issue is a lack of supply, especially supply of very inexpensive, durable homes for low income people. We should be building them and giving them out.

mizblueprint

@Daojoan
I had forgotten about this eye-popping data site, "Inside Airbnb". We really don't have a supply problem. LA County has almost 45,000 short term rental units. There are about 75,000 unhoused people in LA County at the last "point in time" count earlier this year.

insideairbnb.com/

FinalOverdrive

@Daojoan well even Chocolate Rain was about racism.

Go Up