However, I also notice that netdata is branded as a "CNCF" project - which must be fully open source.
As well as an "Open Source Best Practices" badge from the openssf project, with similar requirements.
So I report the new state to those orgs https://github.com/coreinfrastructure/best-practices-badge/issues/2153.
๐งต 7 / 10
From the very beginning of that report, the project has now repeatedly claimed and lied about:
"We are transparent about the inclusion of the binary UI component" (They are not, hidden in the readme until my recent change request)
"Netdata fully complies with the GPL v3+ license" (It doesn't in any way that matters, the v2 blobs shipped are closed source. Atleast they switched to "netdata agent" now).
And of course they also have a CLA.
๐งต 8 / 10
From the very beginning of that report, the project has now repeatedly claimed and lied about:
"We are transparent about the inclusion of the binary UI component" (They are not, hidden in the readme until my recent change request)
"Netdata fully complies with the GPL v3+ license" (It doesn't in any way that matters, the v2 blobs shipped are closed source. Atleast they switched to "netdata agent" now).
And of course they also have a CLA.