Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Wolfshappen's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Wolfshappen ๐Ÿบ

From the very beginning of that report, the project has now repeatedly claimed and lied about:
"We are transparent about the inclusion of the binary UI component" (They are not, hidden in the readme until my recent change request)
"Netdata fully complies with the GPL v3+ license" (It doesn't in any way that matters, the v2 blobs shipped are closed source. Atleast they switched to "netdata agent" now).
And of course they also have a CLA.

๐Ÿงต 8 / 10

16 August at 15:56 | Open on fellies.social
4 comments
Wolfshappen ๐Ÿบ

And then tried to lecture on why the open source community really wants blobs and closed source and how it's all OK for Sustainability and how they're totally still open source.
A proposed fix for a previous bug was that they could just always load the closed code from their cdn, thats good right?

v0/v1 are getting removed: github.com/netdata/netdata/pul
Just look at those new juicy restrictions to squeeze money from users!
(this will make only the agent packageable for distros, if at all)

๐Ÿงต 9 / 10

And then tried to lecture on why the open source community really wants blobs and closed source and how it's all OK for Sustainability and how they're totally still open source.
A proposed fix for a previous bug was that they could just always load the closed code from their cdn, thats good right?

v0/v1 are getting removed: github.com/netdata/netdata/pul
Just look at those new juicy restrictions to squeeze money from users!
(this will make only the agent packageable for distros, if at all)

16 August at 15:56 | Open on fellies.social
Wolfshappen ๐Ÿบ

So in conclusion:
Dont use netdata anymore, if you like it fully open source.

Dont use netdata anymore, if you're interested in not being forced into a subscription model sooner or later.

Dont use netdata anymore, if you're interested in long-term availability of "the vibrant community" they claim on their homepage.

Dont give them your code under CLA.

And DUCK the Marketing Responses from them, and them trying to keep up the good looks of being open source while enshittifying.

So in conclusion:
Dont use netdata anymore, if you like it fully open source.

Dont use netdata anymore, if you're interested in not being forced into a subscription model sooner or later.

Dont use netdata anymore, if you're interested in long-term availability of "the vibrant community" they claim on their homepage.

16 August at 15:57 | Open on fellies.social
Wolfshappen ๐Ÿบ

You've made it this far, have a few bonus images where they lie about their "platform" being open source - remember, only the agent is, and they want to make you pay (with data, or money, subject to their terms) for viewing the data going forward:

A screenshot of the Netdata project on github, claiming to be the "open source observability platform everyone needs", despite locking their platform down into very limited and paid accounts soon.
A picture of the docker hub description of the netdata container reading "the open-source [...] monitoring" which claims to be open source while it ships closed source code right now.
A screenshot of the netdata website, which puts the claim for netdata of an active and vibrant open source community in contrast with "other commercial closed source software" as netdata is currently becoming closed source itself
16 August at 16:03 | Open on fellies.social
Wolfshappen ๐Ÿบ replied to Wolfshappen

All i can say after all this:

( Art by @JF049 on Telegram )

#xenia

A sticker of Xenia, the better linux mascot, with a sign infront reading "Absolutely Propreitary". Art by @JF049 on Telegram.
16 August at 16:30 | Open on fellies.social
Go Up