Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Isaac Ji Kuo

@jzillw @Leszek_Karlik @cstross

That's why it's not really a weapon system problem, it's a detection and tracking problem. A human shotgunner can handle the kill IF the tracking system shows him where the incoming threat is.

This system could include a network of spaced apart microphones - perhaps microphones on each soldier. This won't be able to detect glide bombs, but could track the location of most nearby drones with adequate precision.

2 comments
Brie Mmm

Acoustic detection was all the rage before radar was invented; most devices were rather unwieldy, but there were also portable personal systems, like this German one:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-M7iDSsoA6_g/V8jmRT8R6AI/AAAAAAAAK4w/5agLXmyGXYImWKRCs5w_nRAyBnkyZHwGgCLcB/s1600/acoustic_locator_13.jpg

where sound tubes were paired with “glasses”, to precisely direct line of sight.

Microphone network would need to have current and precise information about soldiers' relative postitions; I wonder what method would be fast, precise and not easy to spot by itself.

Acoustic detection was all the rage before radar was invented; most devices were rather unwieldy, but there were also portable personal systems, like this German one:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-M7iDSsoA6_g/V8jmRT8R6AI/AAAAAAAAK4w/5agLXmyGXYImWKRCs5w_nRAyBnkyZHwGgCLcB/s1600/acoustic_locator_13.jpg

where sound tubes were paired with “glasses”, to precisely direct line of sight.

7leaguebootdisk

@isaackuo @jzillw @Leszek_Karlik @cstross they use acoustic detection to spot long range Russian drones already.

Go Up