@foone Is there any reason this is useful? Like having RISCV is fun and cool, but surely this doesn't do anything practical that a pure-ARM device can't
Top-level
@foone Is there any reason this is useful? Like having RISCV is fun and cool, but surely this doesn't do anything practical that a pure-ARM device can't 3 comments
@Gaelan @foone yeah. If the Risc-v side didn't function, they would blow a fuse and never tell anybody about it. If it turns out to be too buggy, they'll put out an advisory to stick with the arm personality. But if the risc-v side works and customers like it, then a future design could leave out the ARM license altogether. |
@Gaelan I really don't know. I guess some people are looking to try risc-v? and this lets them do that without needing to buy a risc-v-only board.