Suggested change to the #uxn macros, some thoughts and ideas. It doesn't break compatibility and should make writing a few things a bit more fun.
https://lists.sr.ht/~rabbits/uxn/%3Ccf45df06-c866-4909-9a6d-aef54083f986@100r.co%3E
Suggested change to the #uxn macros, some thoughts and ideas. It doesn't break compatibility and should make writing a few things a bit more fun. 4 comments
@neauoire Regarding the first proposed change, one nice thing about stream processing is that macro-defining macros are easily supported. @wim_v12e I'm glad to hear! I've begun the work, I'll make another post when it's safe to use! |
@neauoire I’m totally in favor of this backwards compatible change, especially if it means drifblim will get macro support!