Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
InsertUser

@simon @SK53 @wikipedia @seav @edward @richardf where is the discussion archived for its proposed deletion?

The book burners at Wikipedia seems to be in charge these days.

3 comments
Simon Poole

@InsertUser @SK53 @wikipedia @seav @edward @richardf wasn't deleted, instead the entry was redirected to the OpenStreetMap entry. If the content had been integrated in to that, it would have been OKish (except that the OSM article is really bad with lots of bloopers, but still better than the German one).

InsertUser

@simon @SK53 @wikipedia @seav @edward @richardf that's still a deletion in my book. All the information was deleted and the page made more hidden than if it had been left as red text.

InsertUser

@simon @SK53 @wikipedia @seav @edward @richardf
LOL, the person who appears to have changed it to a redirect has as one of their "objectives":

> Neutral inclusionism: Ensure the objectivity, completeness, and lack of historical revision, of the history of computing and gaming. Convert condemnations into explanations.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:S

So to make it more complete delete the info.

What happened to warnings about stubs that need expansion and discussion before deletion?

@simon @SK53 @wikipedia @seav @edward @richardf
LOL, the person who appears to have changed it to a redirect has as one of their "objectives":

> Neutral inclusionism: Ensure the objectivity, completeness, and lack of historical revision, of the history of computing and gaming. Convert condemnations into explanations.

Go Up