Gregory's Server
@Eramdam @mcc having given it a quick read I think I agree with andi here more than I did before I read the explainer
like... I guess the intentions are good? but they're coming from a position of "we need to make the web more useful to advertisers" and that's an inherently bad position, and any intentions you have that come from it are also inherently bad, ultimately
we need to stop capitulating to advertisers and investors. the stance mozilla seems to have taken as late, of "we need to show everyone else how this can be done responsibly, because they're doing it irresponsibly" is one I reject outright and this solution only makes sense if you accept that stance
@demize @mcc for clarity i wasn't saying andi is wrong. Just adding onto the thread for ppl who might have found that interesting + I feel the explainer is more technical than whatever copy Mozilla uses in their support documentation.