@cuchaz Don't get me wrong, I would much better prefer that web ads completely disappear and I block all of them anyway. But there are many people not willing to block ads for some reasons. For them, this is a huge privacy improvement, isn't it?
If Firefox starts to also block classic ads by default and only allow this kind of ads, I would be a supporter, but I would still opt out.
@mo8it The best outcome for privacy in advertising in my opinion is to return to content-based advertising rather than surveillance-based advertising. That will help even those who for some reason choose not to block ads.
I'm not sure how to actually make that happen long-term, but having the browser spy on you instead of the websites feels like a step backwards instead of forwards.
Making surveillance-based advertising fail by using aggressive adblock feels like the way forward. If a content-based system were implemented using first-party advertising (like the system we had before all this surveillance madness), then it adblockers couldn't even block it, visitors don't get surveilled, and authors still get paid. Feels like everybody wins?
@mo8it The best outcome for privacy in advertising in my opinion is to return to content-based advertising rather than surveillance-based advertising. That will help even those who for some reason choose not to block ads.
I'm not sure how to actually make that happen long-term, but having the browser spy on you instead of the websites feels like a step backwards instead of forwards.