Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Tane Piper ⁂

@emilymbender @mattb @hipsterelectron @dalias I make this as my own observation, not as an explanation. Obviously you know more in the academic field, but I also observe on the practitioner space where we are looking at putting them in front of people and I'm not so sure.

Not every message has the intent you seem to be alluding to

3 comments
Emily M. Bender (she/her)

@tanepiper Please feel free to make your observations outside of my mentions, then. As it stands, you have addressed this comment to me, in response to my post, without any connective text indicating how it is supposed to relate. It reads as if you felt that I needed to be enlightened.

Emily M. Bender (she/her) replied to Emily M. Bender (she/her)

@tanepiper Also, in case you missed it, mansplaining is never about intent.

Tane Piper ⁂ replied to Emily M. Bender (she/her)

@emilymbender no, apologies if it came off that way - reading it with a tinge of sarcasm and deadpan humour helps (but of course that does not come across in text). Many sales teams of products promise infinite productivity gains and it's exhausting. I've clarified it's this hopefully.

FWIW I was already in this particular thread, just a different branch 🤷🏼‍♀️

tane.codes/@tanepiper/11274034

Go Up