@mgorny They apparently also decided to say the project is now MIT-licensed (nose was LGPL) and they fail to understand that's impossible. https://github.com/mdmintz/pynose/issues/16
Top-level
@mgorny They apparently also decided to say the project is now MIT-licensed (nose was LGPL) and they fail to understand that's impossible. https://github.com/mdmintz/pynose/issues/16 3 comments
@kumarvibe I've nothing against the premise (like @mgorny), but I find the statements on the LGPL vs MIT licence of the new maintainer very problematic (see issue linked in @hroncok's post) |
@hroncok @mgorny I wonder what JP and @kumarvibe think about this