@kytta @hroncok @mgorny looks like it fixes the otherwise unmaintained nose so it’s compatible with Python 3.13+. Seems like a good thing, no?
@kumarvibe I've nothing against the premise (like @mgorny), but I find the statements on the LGPL vs MIT licence of the new maintainer very problematic (see issue linked in @hroncok's post)
Gregory's Server
@kumarvibe I've nothing against the premise (like @mgorny), but I find the statements on the LGPL vs MIT licence of the new maintainer very problematic (see issue linked in @hroncok's post)