Gregory's Server@graue yes, correct on -m.
What I like about having this in git is that it stores the important information in git rather than in github dot com
|
Top-level
 @graue yes, correct on -m. What I like about having this in git is that it stores the important information in git rather than in github dot com 1 comment
|
@darius @graue If you require merge commits, the description of the PR gets copied into the merge commit message. It’s another reason why I personally don’t understand the Rebase/Squash lifestyle: use merge commits and that PR description you put a lot of writing in on github gets nicely copied into your git history.
(Plus then you can use tools like —first-parent with merge commits.)