Gregory's Server@drdpov @noondlyt @johnglass @kevinrothrock if you love cryptocurrency and can turn a blind eye to Brendan Eich, which is a lot to ask, then you still can't pretend Brave isn't reliant on Chrome's source code, and as such largely at the whims of whichever way Google wants to steer the Chromium project. It's like Chromium for people who don't know that browser extensions could've done that all too (or for people who think crypto isn't a scam and/or a little bit of queerphobia is OK as a treat).
|
6 comments
 @grb090423 @TheCoolest @drdpov @noondlyt @johnglass @kevinrothrock Let's see how Google can resist, maybe even longer. I mean they likely have received the same letters? @grb090423 @TheCoolest @drdpov @noondlyt @johnglass @kevinrothrock BTW Mozilla has restored the extensions! https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/14/mozilla_firefox_russia/ @rugk @grb090423 @TheCoolest @noondlyt @johnglass @kevinrothrock the point is that those original requests from authorities did not refer to any low. It's forbidden to promote vpn like services, but hosting or installing them is still permitted. If you want an example of what happens to services which are not complying with laws un russia - they are just getting blocked - like LinledIn, twitter, instagram etc @rugk @grb090423 @TheCoolest @drdpov @noondlyt @johnglass @kevinrothrock I hear this argument quite often, but unlike Google or Microsoft, does Mozilla have or has it ever had any offices or employees in Russia? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contact/spaces/ shows only 4 locations. Also, much bigger companies have left Russia after it started the war. Should have been a no-brainer for Mozilla. |
@TheCoolest @drdpov @noondlyt @johnglass @kevinrothrock
Thanks for clarifying 👍 (rather than just saying something is crap but not saying why).