Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Elizabeth Sudduth

@Oggie @ShaulaEvans @edutooters
Wow, that article is highly credulous and extremely lacking in details about the charges against the student.

"Students could upload materials to a private server not accessible to other users, then use AI to generate study materials."

Translation--students could upload a paper written for a class, and AI would paraphrase it so that other students could turn it in as their own.

1 comment
Oggie

@hydropsyche @ShaulaEvans @edutooters
To be honest, I just grabbed one of the first search results, there is a lot of stuff about this one out there and I couldn't find the one that I read with exhaustive details ( perils of being on my phone), apparently the suspended students ( or at least one of them?) are now suing.

But yes, it was even though there was no cheating they recommended punishment and it's just bonkers, because it was the right hand sabotaging the left.

@hydropsyche @ShaulaEvans @edutooters
To be honest, I just grabbed one of the first search results, there is a lot of stuff about this one out there and I couldn't find the one that I read with exhaustive details ( perils of being on my phone), apparently the suspended students ( or at least one of them?) are now suing.

Go Up