Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Dr. Quadragon ❌

@BigFoxBoss But what if your main niche is just you and your homies?

It's VERY hard to convince people to register on your website so they could interact with just your and their posts, even if they're your friends.

@iliazeus @mittorn

10 comments
BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @iliazeus @mittorn
Niche being you and your homies? What do you mean?
If the case is that they just want to keep contact, people exchanged ICQ/Skype/Mailru thing back in the day for instant messaging (and e-mail before that, websites had e-mail to reach the author anyway).
Some might actually be interested to read their friend's blog and comment on it. Besides, you didn't always have to register on the website itself, there were some comment hostings similar to "disqus".
And having "you and your homies" may already attract some people, friends call their friends in by a word of mouth, some might stick around, then strangers come in to read and follow. It just takes time anyway

@drq @iliazeus @mittorn
Niche being you and your homies? What do you mean?
If the case is that they just want to keep contact, people exchanged ICQ/Skype/Mailru thing back in the day for instant messaging (and e-mail before that, websites had e-mail to reach the author anyway).
Some might actually be interested to read their friend's blog and comment...

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to BigFoxBoss

@BigFoxBoss I'm not an imbecile, I know what instant messaging is, and I remember ICQ. I had a 6-digit number.

I'm talking strictly about social blogging. Only that. Not other platforms/protocols/whatever.

Social networking/social blogging is easy to do when you're on the same website, and nigh impossible to do if you're standalone. Unless there's federation. Then it's not as easy as the same website, but suddenly - it's doable.

@iliazeus @mittorn

BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @iliazeus @mittorn
I am making a point that social blogging you speak of existed on standalone stuff through some means, like, comment hostng services.

Well, somehow people did gain a following before mainstream social networks and microblogging happened.

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to BigFoxBoss

@BigFoxBoss Centralization around Disqus notwithstanding, yeeah, kinda. It's a crawl compared to what we have with Fedi now, though, when you just click "follow" and boom, subscribed.

@iliazeus @mittorn

BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @iliazeus @mittorn
and then the entire feed grows into something unmanageable or take hours to scroll through, which noone except terminally online people can afford.
Said subscriber/follower might just miss things because feed is flooded with memes or whatever happened during the day to someone else who is terminally online babbling about what they did or constantly reblog whatever they saw on a federated timeline. Muting everytime is also kind of annoying, maybe you'd end up missing something again.
And that "missing out" thing is one more can of worms of social networks that builds addiction and it's a whole other topic.
Keeping stuff separate might be more manageable to followers who might just want blogs, for instance, not a constant flood of whatever microblogging stuff is being reblogged/posted

@drq @iliazeus @mittorn
and then the entire feed grows into something unmanageable or take hours to scroll through, which noone except terminally online people can afford.
Said subscriber/follower might just miss things because feed is flooded with memes or whatever happened during the day to someone else who is terminally online babbling about what they did or constantly reblog whatever they saw...

BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @iliazeus @mittorn Also, I heard that tumblr is integrating with AP, so they may join fedi, but no further news on that yet still.
It's a tumbleblog though, something in the middle between a blog and microblog.
I am not even sure how they would even federate and keep formatting intact, but we'll see I guess.

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to BigFoxBoss

@BigFoxBoss They've been promising this for quite a while now.

@iliazeus @mittorn

mittorn replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @BigFoxBoss @iliazeus Even if do normal blogging, mastodon is not good idea.
It does not even accept formatting.
It is possible to implement normal blogs with AP by showing Summary text as post text and blog post data in some other field or even like attachment. Summary should include link to static blog viewer for unsupported instances/frontends and suppoered instances/frontends should implement separate blog interface which only will show blog post and open when expanding blog data. Maybe this similar to vk blogs. This will allow have normal blogging and let users not skip other blog posts because blog posts whill be shown in separate timeline in blog interface.
How blog interface should look? Imagine any news site, which want to keep user reading it as long as possible and remove all ads and.
Also, comments may be shared with microblog interface (which should only show summary for main post).
Also, it is possible to add reply with limited text-based representation of blog post for non-supporting instances or clients. That would not appear in timeline, but would be shown in blog post as first reply.
Why blog post should be separate entity? Because we need support formatting, tables, right-placed attachments (which should federate as well). And of course not limit by attachment entities. For comments, microblog is still ok, it can also fit in blog interface like comments block.

@drq @BigFoxBoss @iliazeus Even if do normal blogging, mastodon is not good idea.
It does not even accept formatting.
It is possible to implement normal blogs with AP by showing Summary text as post text and blog post data in some other field or even like attachment. Summary should include link to static blog viewer for unsupported instances/frontends and suppoered instances/frontends should implement...

Go Up