@BigFoxBoss Mention mentions people. It's all it does.
In-reply-to marks a message as a thing-that-this-message-is-a-reply-to-in-this-particular-conversation. Which is what I want.
Top-level
@BigFoxBoss Mention mentions people. It's all it does. In-reply-to marks a message as a thing-that-this-message-is-a-reply-to-in-this-particular-conversation. Which is what I want. 5 comments
@BigFoxBoss Errrmm... no? What you're describing is making an offshoot thread. Which is what I'm trying to avoid. @BigFoxBoss I don't want "hopefully", I want proper, parsable semantics. |
@drq @mittorn @skobkin
It's as if we're trying to crossbreed chat mechaniccs with microblogging platform.
Matrix has a thing called "discuss" when message is right clicked. It is as if some people went private with their discussion thread away from the main thread, except it's not public. If it becomes public, then it just becomes yet another thread where everyone is free to join and the whole point of "reply-to-convo" thing collapses again :blobfoxthink: