Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
D:\side\

@drq it'd be kinda hard to pack this into a coherent and usable user interface. Even trees are apparently hard enough for support to be hit-and-miss.

And there's an easy workaround that makes this feature less attractive: canonical branches. Post one answer, post links to it in other places where you want it to be.

And links can be accompanied by a comment that explains the relevance of the link. As my experience on Stack Overflow tells me, flagging something as a duplicate of something highly abstract might not help much (I have seen an embarrassingly high number of confused responses from people asking about asynchronous returns in JavaScript when duped to a comprehensive overview of this class of issues).

You can sometimes see me reply with links to my earlier messages or my garden. That's exactly this technique at work. (Maybe establishing a canonical reply thread for each page of the garden would reduce the discussion friction, but I'm not feeling *that* adventurous yet.)

2 comments
Dr. Quadragon ❌

@dside Yeah, you can post a link to a post, yadda-yadda.

Doesn't make two posts properly, semantically linked, so it won't show up if I want a digest or visualization or something.

D:\side\

@drq I hear that. But it's got to have some good utility for others to get aboard. What's been stated so far is kinda minor, considering the workaround above. And with a major migration cost of replacing a single optional field with a recordset in a new table (on an RDBMS-backed Fedi node which I'd expect to be the vast majority). That'll take some convincing.

Go Up