@mvu @markgg42 @laurenshof
...where that range of error is two orders of magnitude.😆
Top-level
4 comments
@mvu @markgg42 @laurenshof @FeralRobots @markgg42 @laurenshof but you would theoretically ask someone *else* about about their sibling situation to get your numbers. For example, of you asked *me* (someone with 0 sisters, -1.49 brothers, and 5 courses) you will find that the algorithm gives the expected result! @mvu @markgg42 @laurenshof |
@FeralRobots @markgg42 @laurenshof No, the person who asked this question likely had between 679.8 and 680.2 sisters. The math checks out (assuming the other person did in fact have 5 courses, the answer is vague on that, which is a little disappointing)