@molly0xfff @maxeddy nobody wants this. I don’t even want it as a forensic analyst.
Top-level
@molly0xfff @maxeddy nobody wants this. I don’t even want it as a forensic analyst. 3 comments
@hacks4pancakes @molly0xfff @maxeddy There is something I have said to many co-workers over the years that seems appropriate: “It could be worse, but I don’t know how.” @hacks4pancakes @molly0xfff @maxeddy How on earth do they expect this to comply with FISMA or NISPOM? |
@hacks4pancakes @molly0xfff @maxeddy
Nobody on the right side of history wants it, but some people want it.
Employers want it because they'll be able to replace human beings after those humans have trained the device on its individual tasks. They think this will be cheap, but really it just needs to be slightly cheaper than labor, which isn't cheap.
Microsoft wants it because they'll be able to sell individualized labor as a service back to employers, even holding their service equipment hostage and forcing those employers to do it. Plus all this feeds the bigger model, apart from the individualized CoPilot+ systems.
The government wants it because it creates a back door for surveillance under the US PATRIOT Act.
Laborers should learn to recognize these NPU enabled devices right now and sabotage them. They're training their replacements. This is the moment to smash the frames again. It should be the ultimate red flag for all workers to have your work equipment upgraded with an NPU enabled device. You get one and you can set a timer of about a year before you're going to be replaced.
@hacks4pancakes @molly0xfff @maxeddy
Nobody on the right side of history wants it, but some people want it.
Employers want it because they'll be able to replace human beings after those humans have trained the device on its individual tasks. They think this will be cheap, but really it just needs to be slightly cheaper than labor, which isn't cheap.