@nixCraft
That's wrong twice; first on pi's irrationality, and second that the digits ChatGPT is quoting rounds up the last digit.
The first few digits are 3.141592653589793 -- so GPT should have said 65358....
Top-level
@nixCraft The first few digits are 3.141592653589793 -- so GPT should have said 65358.... 15 comments
@dougmerritt @kupac I'm boosting, not because of what you wrote, but because of that hilarious handle: That is brilliant! I'm going to go boost all the posts where that appears. @potungthul @kupac "You're a gentleman and a scholar", as they apparently used to say. I looked it up to make sure it didn't surprise me by having some negative twist: https://writingtips.org/a-gentleman-and-a-scholar/ Edit: I see in your profile now "(Shamelessly stolen from @alexraffa @kupac @nixCraft Most research mathematicians think it's likely, but that's not the same as certain, by any means. @dougmerritt @kupac @nixCraft yes, it has not been proven, it's fun to think every numer is contained in pi somewhere .. ๐ @alexraffa @kupac @dougmerritt @nixCraft I would assume that every (finite) sequence of numbers appears in PI an infinite number of times: the proof is left as an exercise. @gam3 @alexraffa @kupac @nixCraft As I already said. The field of study where personal opinion is superior to provable facts is modern politics, not mathematics. @dougmerritt @nixCraft Or if you give it a little more credit, perhaps it knows pi to 245962 decimal places! |
@dougmerritt @nixCraft But how was the poor thing to know that the last digit a calculator shows is not the last digit of pi. Don't be so harsh, the little bugger has only just begun learning about the big world...